Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Trees are symbols of maturity and wisdom, of resilience and sturdiness. So perhaps it should come as no surprise that so many mutual funds choose to name themselves after them. As we see it, the sense of long-term security that tree names convey may be particularly appealing to people saving for retirement—exactly the type of investors portfolio managers are looking to attract.
In an article about this topic, The Wall Street Journal memorably said, “Portfolios—like trees—don’t grow overnight, but can reach substantial heights.” The symbolism of trees is obviously an appealing metaphor for investments, but such a name also has strategic and practical value for fund managers.
Navigating SEC Naming Regulations
Beyond its marketing appeal, a mutual fund’s name must also comply with SEC regulations. A fund is required to invest at least 80% of its assets into the types of securities implied in its name. For example, a fund named XYZ Biotech Fund must allocate at least 80% of its investments to biotech.
A fund with a more evocative name, on the other hand—like XYZ Magnolia Fund—is considered “unconstrained,” meaning its investment strategy is not dictated by its name. This flexibility allows fund managers more freedom in portfolio decisions, but it also comes with tradeoffs.
The Tradeoff Between Flexibility and Clarity
While unconstrained funds stand out with evocative, memorable names, they can create challenges for financial advisors. Advisors typically categorize funds based on asset class—large-cap, small-cap, sector-based, emerging markets, etc.—to build balanced portfolios with clear risk/reward profiles. If a fund’s name doesn’t align with a defined investment strategy, advisors may struggle to understand where it fits.
For retail investors, however, these unconstrained names may have greater appeal, particularly for those making one-off investment decisions rather than assembling a structured portfolio. A name like Magnolia, Oak, or Redwood might resonate with individuals looking for a fund that symbolizes growth and stability rather than adhering to a strict risk category.
Matching Fund Names to Investor Expectations
A fund targeting retail investors might benefit from a more evocative name, one that evokes trust, longevity, and resilience. However, for funds that will be included among a list of 401(k) investment options, a clear, descriptive nameis typically more effective.
Investors and advisors selecting funds within a structured platform expect straightforward names that immediately communicate investment objectives and risk profiles.
The Role of Naming in Mutual Fund Marketing
Clearly, naming a mutual fund is a strategic decision with multiple considerations. A fund’s name is often the first touchpoint for investors, shaping their perception and influencing their selection.
Some funds may find that incorporating oaks, aspens, and redwoods in their names conveys height, breadth, growth, and long-term stability—all attributes that align with an investor’s long-term financial goals. Others may prefer an unambiguous, category-specific name that signals a clear investment strategy from the outset.
Ultimately, understanding how investors make decisions is essential to smart fund naming. A name is more than a label—it’s a powerful tool for positioning, differentiation, and trust-building in a competitive market.
Want to discuss naming strategies for your financial products? Let’s talk.
Originally published October 29, 2020.
